Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania

A narrative account of creating fracking pipeline data for northeastern Pennsylvania

Overview

Gathering lines are not consistently documented by public agencies. As part of FracTracker’s efforts to supply the public with reliable data on oil and gas gathering pipelines, spring Data & GIS intern Jack traced gathering lines in Bradford County, PA.

The Project

For every natural gas well, there is a network of pipelines and compressors that transport the material to refinement and distribution centers. Overall, there are two types of pipelines: gathering lines and transmission lines. Gathering lines transport materials from the wells to the larger transmission lines that pump materials across state lines. While transmission lines—like the Keystone XL pipeline—make national news, people often overlook the details of the underlying gathering lines.

In order to better understand their environmental and social impacts, FracTracker Alliance has a large ongoing project to map these gathering lines. As a part of this project, I analyzed fracking development in northeastern Pennsylvania. This particular area is a stronghold of the fracking industry and features over 8,000 unconventional natural gas wells.

Bradford County, Pennsylvania

Bradford County is one of the region’s hotspots for fracking activity. According to the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PA DEP), the first fracking permit dates all the way back to 1995. However. large expansion of this industry did not begin until 2010. From the beginning of 2010 to the end of 2011, the PA DEP issued over 1,500 permits for unconventional natural gas wells. Permitting rates remained high through 2015 before dropping off. In total, the PA DEP has issued over 4,000 fracking permits, and there are currently over 500 active wells in Bradford county.

From our tracing efforts, we recorded roughly 7,000 acres (~11 square miles) of land cleared for gathering lines in Bradford County alone. To put this number into perspective, that is about half the entire acreage of Manhattan. This acreage total is just for the network of pipelines and does not include the area cleared for the wells as well. These gathering lines cut through a variety of landscapes. Some well pads and gathering lines are completely encased in forest, while others zig-zag through residential and agricultural areas.

The footprint of this industry is everywhere in Bradford county. While combing through thousands of acres of satellite imagery, I often wondered why this was needed. There had to be somebody holding this information already. Once I had nearly finished with Bradford County, I learned that FracTracker Alliance had digitized records presented to the public by the county. These were records of both where gathering lines were, and proposals of new pipelines to install.

Part of me was relieved. In my mind, the accounting of ubiquitous infrastructure that can affect communities should be the responsibility of the state or federal government—not a small organization. However, I quickly realized there was an issue.

Map 1

Bradford County PA gathering lines map
Figure 1. Comparison of gathering line data in Bradford County. The county record of proposed and existing gathering lines is purple and the area cleared for gathering lines traced from satellite imagery is outlined in black with orange fill.

The map above shows the proposed gathering lines in purple and the gathering lines traced using satellite imagery in black and orange. Overall, the general shape of the county’s record and traced are nearly the same. Viewing at this scale, there appears to only be a small difference in placement between the information presented to the public and what was actually put into the ground.

Map 2

Figure 2. A comparison of gathering line data in Bradford County at the local level. The county record is purple, while the area cleared for gathering lines traced from satellite imagery is orange with a black outline.

However, when we zoom in, the differences in the data quality become clear. The county record contains only lines and do not plot out the actual area used. As a result, this data functionally has very few uses. For example, the county cannot calculate the amount of forest cleared due to construction or how much pipeline is in areas with high erosion.

The information available to the public is also only the idealized shape and does not represent the actual construction. From tracing the satellite images, you can tell construction workers must make many decisions during the installation process that deviate from a perfect shape. However, a proper record of these decisions—the little kinks and turns of this network—are never asked for. You might also notice that there are whole sections of traced gathering lines completely absent from the county record.

At times, the county record differs from the actual placement by nearly one-thousand feet. This is not a rounding error. That difference is like mistaking your neighbor’s house down the street for your own. It is not an acceptable standard of information. We need greater detail.

The Take Away

There are large discrepancies surrounding the data about gathering lines. Often information about fracking and the energy industry is not readily available to the public for reasons of national security. However, by not having accurate information available at the local level, communities are ill prepared to manage and respond when problems arise. While the natural gas industry is not new, many of the functional elements of fracking are. This includes topic like how to manage fracking waste, what is the proper distance to maintain from extraction activities, and how to plug or deprecate old wells. As this industry continues, local communities have the burden of figuring out these answers while equipped with poor information.

FracTracker Alliance’s ongoing work to map out these gathering lines is a great first step for providing these communities with the information they need. However, due to the limitations of different tracing methods and the sheer size of the fracking industry, it is difficult to produce anything more than a conservative estimate of all this infrastructure. In order for communities to fully assess the environmental effects, there needs to be a fundamental change in the type, quality, and availability of information governments demands from this industry.

References & Where to Learn More

Topics in This Article:

Join the Conversation

2 replies
  1. Steve
    Steve says:

    It would be so much more useful and publicly transparent if the PADEP would post online the GIS shapefile information regarding the locations of pipelines, wells, etc. (really any large project). They get shapefiles from the applicants when they are reviewing permit applications, so it is a simple matter to post it online. I do not buy the argument that the locations are confidential because it is critical energy infrastructure somehow protected for national security purposes. When the pipelines are only “proposed” they present no risk, and once they are in the ground, it is clear to anyone where they are.

Comments are closed.

Stay Informed

FracTracker Newsletter

Support Our Work

FracTracker Alliance helps communicate the risks of oil and gas and petrochemical development to advance just energy alternatives that protect public health, natural resources, and the climate.

By contributing to FracTracker, you are helping to make tangible changes, such as decreasing the number of oil and gas wells in the US, protecting the public from toxic and radioactive chemicals, and stopping petrochemical expansion into vulnerable communities.

Your donations help fund the sourcing and analysis of new data so that we can keep you informed and continually update our resources.

Please donate to FracTracker today as a way to advocate for clean water, clean air, and healthy communities.

What You Should Read Next

Comment Opposing the Southeast Supply Enhancement Project (SSEP) – Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit Application (SAW-2024-01961)

/
FracTracker Alliance strongly opposes the Southeast Supply Enhancement Project and its Clean Water Act permit application.

Pipeline Incidents Are a Daily Occurrence

Pipeline incidents are more common, more dangerous, and more underreported than you might realize. This articles investigates a critical infrastructure system plagued by daily disasters and raises serious questions about data integrity and public safety. Read on to discover the full extent of the problem.
Great Plains Action Society

Indigenous Communities’ Fight Against CO2 Pipelines in the Great Plains

FracTracker Alliance and Great Plains Action Society have launched an environmental justice mapping tool to support Indigenous communities in their resistance against CO2 pipelines.
destroyed home following pipeline explosion in San Bruno, CA

A Closer Look at Risks of the Appalachian Hydrogen Hub

The U.S. Department of Energy's ARCH2 hydrogen hub project presents substantial risks to the environment and human health and safety.
FracTracker Alliance, 2024

Falcon Pipeline Criminal Charges Explained

/
On April 19, 2024, Pennsylvania Attorney General Michelle Henry charged Shell Pipeline Company LP with 13 misdemeanor charges for failure to report or underreporting industrial waste releases during the construction of the Falcon Pipeline in Pennsylvania.
Tennessee Pipeline Incident by Ted Auch, 2022, with support from LightHawk.Ted Auch, FracTracker Alliance, 2022

2022 Pipeline Incidents Update: Is Pipeline Safety Achievable?

/
This analysis provides a top-level summary of pipeline incidents reported to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and examines whether or not safe oversight of the industry is possible.
Stacked pipes used in constructing oil and gas pipelines

A Contentious Landscape of Pipeline Build-outs in the Eastern US

/
In this article, we’ll feature four contentious pipeline build-outs in the Eastern United States, show ways in which those pipelines impact natural and human communities, and provide examples of how environmental advocates have challenged these projects, with varying degrees of success.

Coursing Through Gasland: A Digital Atlas Exploring Natural Gas Development in the Towanda Creek Watershed

This digital atlas exploring natural gas development in the Towanda Creek watershed is the fourth in a series of FracTracker Alliance watershed impact analyses in the Susquehanna River Basin.

Falcon Pipeline Online, Begins Operations Following Violations of Clean Streams Law

The Shell ethane cracker in Beaver County, Pennsylvania, and Falcon Pipeline begin operations following civil penalties from Pennsylvania regulators for violations of the Clean Streams Law.

Pipeline Right-of-Ways: Making the Connection between Forest Fragmentation and the Spread of Lyme Disease in Southwestern Pennsylvania

/
While many ecological factors may contribute to the spread of Lyme disease, two of the most significant factors are believed to be climate change and forest fragmentation. This study assesses the role that different pipeline construction proxies play in the change in average annual Lyme disease rate in Pennsylvania counties from 2001 to 2019.
Map of potential carbon capture technology

An Insider Take on the Appalachian Hydrogen & CCUS Conference

Reflections on the Appalachian Hydrogen and Carbon Capture conference, and how companies hope to use new tech to prolong fossil fuel dependence

Real Talk on Pipelines

This story map contains audio clips and quotes from local officials and residents on the impacts of oil & gas pipelines in their communities.
Russia Ukraine Energy Map

Mapping Energy Systems Impacted by the Russia-Ukraine War

/
This story map explores how the West's failure to transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy is funding Russia's invasion of Ukraine

New Letter from Federal Regulators Regarding how the Falcon has Been Investigated

FracTracker received a letter from federal regulators with news on Shell's Falcon Pipeline investigation, but many concerns still remain.

Chickahominy Pipeline project tries to exploit an apparent regulatory loophole

Local communities are skeptical of the Chickahominy Pipeline company, which plans to build a supply line through five Virginia counties. With no track record and very little experience in pipeline construction, the company's capacity to take on this project is questionable.

Map Update on Criminal Charges Facing Mariner East 2 Pipeline

/
FracTracker mapped the 21 locations and over 120 violations by Energy Transfer Partner since Mariner East 2 Pipeline construction began.

Infrastructure Networks in Texas

This map illustrates infrastructure networks in Texas and explores how these unseen webs connect us and improve lives, but also carry risks and burdens.

Ongoing Safety Concerns over Shell’s Falcon Pipeline

Ohio River Valley Groups react to a new safety warning issued by federal regulators to Shell regarding the troubled Falcon Pipeline

Updated National Energy and Petrochemical Map

/
We first released this map in February of 2020. In the year since, the world’s energy systems have experienced record changes. Explore the interactive map, updated by FracTracker Alliance in April, 2021.

Ohio, West Virginia, Pennsylvania Fracking Story Map

FracTracker’s aerial survey of unconventional oil & gas infrastructure and activities in northeast PA to southern OH and central WV
EPA

Impacts of 2020 Colonial Pipeline Rupture Continue to Grow

In August 2020, the Colonial Pipeline ruptured, spilling an estimated 1.2 million gallons of gasoline—18 times more than originally reported.

Mapping Gathering Lines in Bradford County, Pennsylvania

/
FracTracker mapped gathering lines in Bradford County, PA. Public data on gathering lines are incomplete, leaving us to fill in the gaps.

2021 Pipeline Incidents Update: Safety Record Not Improving

The map below shows 6,950 total incidents since 2010, translating to 1.7 incidents per day. Pipelines are dangerous, in part because regulation around them is ineffective.

Risky Byhalia Connection Pipeline Threatens Tennessee & Mississippi Health, Water Supply

/
The proposed Byhalia Connection pipeline project is situated in a particularly problematic intersection where environmental justice, hydrology, geology, and risks to human and environmental health intersect.

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline Under Investigation for Serious Public Safety Threats

Shell’s Falcon Pipeline, which is designed to carry ethane to the Shell ethane cracker in Beaver County, PA for plastic production, has been under investigation by federal and state agencies, since 2019.
Mapping gathering lines in OH and WV feature

Mapping Gathering Lines in Ohio and West Virginia

As a spring 2020 intern with FracTracker, my work mostly involved…
FracTracker Falcon Pipeline spills map

Falcon Pipeline Construction Releases over 250,000 Gallons of Drilling Fluid in Pennsylvania and Ohio

Part of the Falcon Public Environmental Impact Assessment - a…
North Brooklyn Pipeline demographics map

New Yorkers mount resistance against North Brooklyn Pipeline

/
By Kim Fraczek (Sane Energy Project), with input and mapping…

National Energy and Petrochemical Map

/
This map from FracTracker Alliance is filled with energy and petrochemical data. Explore the map, continue reading to learn more, and see how your state measures up!
destroyed home following pipeline explosion in San Bruno, CA

Pipelines Continue to Catch Fire and Explode

/
For the past decade, petroleum operators in the United States…

The Falcon Public Monitoring Project

/
Part of the Falcon Public EIA Project In March of 2019, two…

Release: The 2019 You Are Here map launches, showing New York’s hurdles to climate leadership

/
For Immediate Release Contact: Lee Ziesche, lee@saneenergyproject.org,…

The Growing Web of Oil and Gas Pipelines

Although the vast majority of scientists agree that we must…
destroyed home following pipeline explosion in San Bruno, CA

Unnatural Disasters

Guest blog by Meryl Compton, policy associate with Frontier Group Roughly…